Portfolio Prioritization That Executives Actually Trust
I’ve been in those meetings. The PMO comes in with a polished deck, every project carefully ranked. And within minutes, the conversation unravels.
“Why is my project so low on the list?”
Suddenly, the focus shifts from value to negotiation. Projects move up and down based on who argues hardest, not what delivers the most.
It’s a slow and painful moment as a PMO leader: you can feel credibility slipping. Executives stop debating the portfolio and start questioning the PMO itself.
And once that happens, you’re no longer leading the portfolio—you’re just administering someone else’s decisions.
Why PMOs Struggle with Prioritization
So why does this happen?
Some PMOs over-engineer prioritization, building models with weightings and formulas so complex they’re impossible to explain. Executives tune out before the conversation even starts.
Others swing to the opposite extreme: simple three-criteria grids (cost, risk, alignment) that don’t add any real insight. They look neat but feel hollow.
The deeper problem is trust. Executives don’t believe the criteria reflect reality. They suspect sponsors are gaming the numbers—and sometimes they’re right. Inflate the benefits, minimize the risks, and suddenly a pet project rises to the top.
Even when the math is solid, politics creep in. One executive declares their initiative “mission critical,” and the model collapses under pressure.
The outcome is predictable:
- Pet projects dominate.
- Strategic initiatives stall.
- The PMO loses credibility.
The Cost of Broken Prioritization
When executives stop trusting the process, they bypass it. Decisions shift into side conversations where the PMO isn’t invited. By the time the official meeting happens, the deals are already done.
The damage spreads quickly:
-
Teams are forced to deliver low-value projects while transformative ones wait.
-
Budgets stretch thin across too many initiatives.
- Resources burn out juggling political priorities instead of strategic ones.
And the hardest part? Once executives stop believing in your prioritization model, rebuilding that trust can take years.
What Executives Actually Trust
Executives don’t trust models that feel like black boxes. They don’t want to be told, “Here’s the score, so this is the answer.”
They want transparency.
They want to see how decisions connect to value.
They want to know the model is simple enough to be understood but strong enough to stand up under pressure.
In my experience, there are three anchors that shift the conversation from politics to trust:
- Value Scores. These go beyond generic “strategic alignment.” They link projects directly to measurable outcomes: revenue growth, cost reduction, risk mitigation, customer satisfaction. A well-designed value scorecard translates strategy into numbers executives can defend.
- Cost-Benefit Analysis. Executives are accountable for ROI. If your model doesn’t show cost versus value in a way they can digest, they’ll default to gut decisions. A clear cost-benefit view—preferably visual—lets them see what they get for what they spend.
- Visual Models. Executives trust what they can see. A heatmap of value vs. cost. A bubble chart of strategic impact vs. risk. A dashboard showing portfolio balance across strategic themes. This is where Smartsheet shines turning raw scores into visuals that tell a story.
When you build prioritization around these three anchors, executives stop questioning your process and start engaging in it.
If your PMO is struggling with prioritization credibility,
Here’s where I’d start:
- Redefine your criteria with the business. Don’t sit in a PMO bubble. Facilitate workshops with executives to agree on what “value” means in your organization. Get alignment on categories: financial, customer, compliance, innovation.
- Score for value, not just effort. A high-cost, high-value project is worth considering. A low-cost, low-value one isn’t. Move beyond “how long will it take?” and focus on “what will it deliver?”
- Build a transparent cost-benefit view. Even a simple two-axis chart (value vs. cost) is more defensible than a hidden formula. Executives can see trade-offs instead of questioning them.
- Pilot a visual model in Smartsheet. Start small: build a prioritization dashboard for one portfolio slice. Show executives how it looks in practice. Once they see the clarity, scaling becomes easier.
- Facilitate, don’t dictate. Your job isn’t to force a ranking—it’s to guide the conversation. Present the data, highlight the trade-offs, and let executives decide. When they own the decision, they trust it.
When Prioritization Finally Works
The shift is noticeable when prioritization is done right.
Instead of arguing over why one project is ranked higher than another, executives start debating timing, sequencing, and trade-offs.
Instead of defending scores, the PMO facilitates conversations about value delivery.
Instead of pet projects dominating, the portfolio begins to reflect strategic priorities.
This change doesn’t come from a magic template. It comes from two things: a framework built around value and cost-benefit clarity, and a tool that makes it transparent and visual. That’s when executives stop fighting the process and start trusting it.
From Framework to Reality
This is where I’ve seen the biggest gap for PMO leaders: knowing what a strong prioritization framework looks like is one thing—getting executives to use it is another.
That’s why I always frame the solution in two layers:
- Framework: You need a prioritization model grounded in value and cost-benefit clarity. This is about design, criteria, and governance.
- Operationalization: You need a tool executives can interact with, one that makes the model real. This is where Smartsheet changes the game. It takes prioritization out of static spreadsheets and puts it into live dashboards and visual models.
Without the framework, the tool is meaningless. Without the tool, the framework stays theoretical. You need both.
Bringing It Back to the PMO
At the end of the day, prioritization isn’t just a PMO process, it’s a credibility engine. Every time you walk into that executive room with a model they believe in, you build trust. Every time you show them a portfolio view they can engage with, you strengthen your role.
Prioritization is not about ranking projects. It’s about shaping executive confidence in the portfolio. And when they trust your process, they trust your PMO.
Follow me here for more grounded PMO insights. And if you’re ready to turn prioritization from a political battle into a process executives believe in, let’s talk about how our Consulting Services and Smartsheet Implementations can support your PMO: https://booking.akiflow.com/bruno
